I am attempting to construct a new ontology/mystic approach that is somewhat perhaps paradoxical – influenced by universal unitatianism; discordianism, Ludwig wittgensteins later philosophy regarding language, phenomenonology of KS and using it as a bulwark for a technogaian society/think tank.. globalized egalitarian technocracy.. preserving enlightenment rationalist utilitarian/eudaimonist values, and an overarching unitarian universalist foundation within it.
My focus will be on radical skepticism with radical hope/positivity/affirmation.
The new philosophy/religion, focusing on the empirical, the here and now, the objective fervently- specifically, biopsych, Behavioral neuroscience, cogneuro and maximizing technological means to enhance natural resources and methods in order to enhance our performance and capacity.. implementing it in public health – while treating god, not as something we can give tangible form to, that we can know, but as an admitted, mere cognitive tool- treating god and the afterlife, as “the great suprise”.
Something so incomprehensible and ecstatic, that words are too leaky and a mere grasping at straws.
The basis being that: we have religion and notions of the afterlife for order, some reason to live a certain way, a hope that we continue after this body – it is like creating an imaginary present that we anticipate.
But psychologically, what’s better than a present we anticipate?
A total surprise, an experience we didn’t know we wanted, but shattered our expectations.
Technogaian technocracy doesnt require a notion of singularity – the praxis of this society is empiricism and the technogaian aspect of “be good to gaia, gaia is good to you”.
To drill it home further, universal unitarianism is the main expectation in the society- this isnt a goal to eradicate other religions, but to note that religions have philosophical praxis leading to positive, rich, empirical experiences within humans.. and the goal is to extract these from each one.
My “great surprise” notion isnt intended as a monolith, but something thrown into the mix of universal unitatianism.
I understand different religions and philosophy have different compatibility with another, culturally and ideologically –
I wish, specifically for myself, to cluster compatible ontologies, preserve and actively cluster myself within this school/think tank/theoretical society of this manifesto, either religion or metaphysics that sees consciousness or mathematics as fundamental, is of a nondual idealist strand.. and in which tests these theories i.e mathematical mysticism, pythagoreanism, kabbalah, faggins quantum panpsychism, integrated information theory, david bohm/Karl pribram and kerstrups metaphysics.. and to extract from them.
Also, heavily encourage a pagan, shamanistic, JSK goetic esque, revival and synthesis between each domain/cluster – think maybe, dionysian, ecstatic, techno trance/rave culture, as an example.
My goal is not a radical, accelerationist, revolution.. but a gradual, building of this society, and expanding it outward, via show of proof. Starting small, and increasing funding. Pitching a technogaian society, starting as self sustaining smart cities – relying on emergent tech i.e quaise, fusion drill bit, geothermal, algae/biodigesters, hydro power, and a variety of other energy sources.
America affords religion great protection and adavantages.. and so thats why I wish to form this embryonically as a religious institution.. and thereafter, work on expanding individual, communities, evolving into smart cities, to be multiplied and networked gradually.. with the goal to become a global standard.
Revolution/accelerationist paths are always to the advantage of the elite – a victory wont come from battle, but a philosophy and manifesto so appealing to the elites, the tech bros, the financial titans- that they wish to appeal.
While with the goal of studying of transhumanist endeavors or that of cosmism.. syntellect hypothesis type ideas – the goal is to be gradual, responsible, biologically and ecologically conscious and analytically, rather than just perfomatively, egalitarian.
Leave a comment